The
Road offers to main characters, The Man, and The Boy. Both Father and son. McCarthy chooses no unique names because, I believe,
he wants us to be able to picture ourselves in their position. Just like the lack of an explicit setting, he
wants the reader to be in the wasteland.
The Man
is a very mysterious character in a sense that throughout the story he displays
incredible characteristics. We don’t exactly
get an immediate clear understanding of his character, but rather learn about
him through such scene where he performs his character defining actions. One such scene where we learn about The Man
is shown he is facing off against the stranger and says: “…the bullet travels
faster than sound. It will be in your brain before you can hear it. To hear it
you will need a frontal lobe and things with names like colliculus and temporal
gyrus and you won’t have them anymore” (64).
Here, in this scene, we learn that The Man is pretty smart and knows a
significant amount about the human brain.
Such evidence may point to the fact that he is a possible doctor or
someone with medical expertise. More
evidence to support the claim of The Man being a doctor can come from his
ability to deliver his son and cut the umbilical cord. The Man also seems to be very skilled with a
gun as well. “The man had already dropped
to the ground and he swung with him and leveled the pistol and fired from a
two-handed position balanced on both knees at a distance of six feet. The man
fell back instantly and lay with blood bubbling from the hole in his forehead”
(66). He makes a maze of their tracks so
they can’t be followed. “They kicked
snow over the fire and went on through the trees and circled and came back.
They hurried, leaving a maze of tracks and then they set out back north through
the woods…” (104). The Man is a very versatile
and smart man. He acts only to protect
his son, and is assigned to this duty by God.
It his “warrant” and he makes the comment: “My job is to take care of
you. I was appointed to do that by God. I will kill anyone who touches you. Do
you understand?” (77). The Boy is his
motivator and hope, without him he most likely would have killed himself.
The Boy
is somewhat young but is not old enough to act independently. He relies on his father, The Man, to answer
every question. Almost every piece of
dialogue is the boy asking a question to his father about either the past, what
something is, or if they will die.
Something that struck me as interesting and abnormal was The Boy’s
constant questions about if they will die.
For me, I wouldn’t want to just ask if we were gonna die, it’s a little
grim and no one really knows if or when they will die. The
Man always responds with “not now” or “no” which is reassuring to The Boy. Overall, the boy is upfront with his father,
telling him if he scared, hungry, cold or anything. The Boy faces a changing moment when he is
attacked by the stranger. He becomes more
silent and almost scared in a sense. The
Man acts to protect him from strangers and the “bad guys” of the wasteland. But from another perspective, The Man is one
of those dangerous strangers; scavenging, killing—however he does not do so
gladly—and doing what ever necessary to survive.
The two
are like the sun and the moon. They can
only survive with each other. The Man
would surly kill himself like he stated “’What would you do if I died?’ ‘If you
died I would want to die too’” (11). If
The Man died, The Boy would not survive very long. He has very little skill when it comes to
survival, he’s only a boy. Both are
relatable and are likable, the reader is most likely to see them as just a
family trying to survive and not out to kill anyone. Even in the book, The Man says they are “the
good guys”. We have yet to see if there
is a lapse in time and The Boy becomes more independent, or if the story
continues once The Man dies due to the wasteland or his life-threatening cough. That cough seems to constantly stay with him
and he’s always worried The Boy might catch it, adding to the idea that The Man
might be a threat to The Boy just like any other stranger.
Discussion of the father's character is thoughtful. What ideas do you get about the son, though, as you don't analyze his character as much. Is he not as developed by McCarthy as the father is? What seems to motivate him?
ReplyDeleteI think that we understand the boy less than the man because the book is more from the POV of The Man. I guess The Boy might be motivated by his curiosity and because he has not reached the mental capacity of suicide. The Boy is more characterized by his actions and his questions which I think made it more difficult for me to analyze with as much depth as The Man. With The Man we get his memories and his view of The Boy and the wasteland, allowing me to see his character attitudes more clearly.
DeleteJustin, I think you did a really good job at inferring what the author was getting at with the no names and titles aspect of the novel. It's very interesting the way the book is laid out, and in that sense it seems to make it a book that involves more in depth analysis on the readers part. I know you stated why you think the author has used these titles instead of names, but do you think it is working for you as the reader? Do you think that these questions The Boy is asking has any weigh on what will happen in the future. It seems to me that death seems to be pretty symbolic and will be a factor towards the end of the book.
ReplyDeleteGreat analysis of the two main characters of the novel! I never really figured out for myself that the man was a doctor and the connections you made create a much clearer picture for me. Do you think the boy looks up to his father more as a doctor or a survivor now in this post-apocalyptic war zone? Do you think that the man's identity is being torn away because of this civilization?
ReplyDeleteI think everyone is different in this wastland. But I still think that The Boy sees The Man still has his guardian and father, there to protect. But I think that he changes his view after The Man shoots the stranger. You can tell by The Boy's actions and descriptions of him.
DeleteGreat work Justin. I thought your insight in the beginning was really clever and something I hadn't thought of. Been I think I agree with Kayl in the sense that he is instead suggesting that identity isn't relevant anymore. Who cares what the names of the characters are if their only purpose is to act out their roles of a father protecting his son? Not that Kayl necessarily was making this argument, but I think he was getting at it with his question. Tell me what you think.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your discussion of how the man is depicted in the novel as far as intelligence. I picked up on the his knowledge of the brain, but I clearly missed some of the other things you mentioned. Overall, really good job.